Stereotypies: Antecedents and Consequences in Domestic Dog

Stereotypies Antecedents and Consequences in Domestic DogStereotypies their antecedents and consequences in the domestic dog (Canis Familiaris)1 Chapter 1 Introduction (2000 words) 14241.1 clamant Behaviours 2The simplest behaviors are clamant including normal play but this usually has a challenge, an example is avoiding cracks in the pavement (Williams and Hill, 2012). There are many another(prenominal) kinds of repetitive behaviour, when learning a trick the behaviour is practiced until the whole trick is flawless. Many believe that the young play as a way of practicing the skills necessary when adults however research by Fagen (1981) and Smith (1982) found that play is not practice.1.1.1 Normal behavioursNormal behaviour is essential to promote an animals psychological and physical homeostasis so the animal provide interact with and modify its environs. One of the five freedoms used to assess animal welfare is the ability to discourse normal behaviours (FAWC, 2009). Howev er, the definition of normal behaviours in human verges is relative to a persons culture and age and may be associate to an animals culture. Kilgour (2012) asserts the definition of normal behaviour is not straightforward however, an ethogram of domestic animals nearest wild relatives gives some idea of an animals contrasting behaviours and time budgets. Lindsay (2001pp.40-42) provides a dog ethogram of normal behaviours.Daily activity for dogs and their owners tends to vary twenty-four hour period to day but over the seven days affords a more constant estimate of activity (Dow et al., 2009) this indicates that many companion dogs activities tend to be routine.Stressed dogs ofttimes find grooming calming, if the stress is long term this push aside lead to over grooming causing hair loss and damage to the skin.1.1.2 Abnormal behavioursAbnormal behaviours are those that are atypical of animals in the wild (Birkett and Newton-Fisher, 2011). Abnormal repetitive behaviours are unva rying and apparently functionless that can be readily interrupted, whereas for stereotypy the behaviour must be difficult to interrupt (Mason and Latham, 2004 Haverbeke et al., 2008) these can be either impulsive/compulsive or stereotypies (Garner, 2006).1.1.3 Stereotypic behavioursStereotypic behaviours are all repetitive unexplained behaviours but are not inescapably predictable (Bergeron et al., 2006). Repetitive stereotypic behaviours may be symptomatic of stress but may not necessarily be a problem (Rooney et al., 2009), in the dog this could be grooming to relieve stress and only becomes a problem if it results in hair loss or damage to the skin.1.1.4 StereotypiesMany commonwealth understand the term stereotypy to indicate that an individual exhibits a problem behaviour.1.1.5 The Evolutionary view of StereotypyJapyass and Malange (2014) write that from the evolutionary view the term abnormal behaviour should be avoided, because phenotypic diversity in genes, morphology and b ehaviour are major forces driving evolution. Phenotypic diversity is important as enables an organism to adapt to advanced environments those behaviours that seem abnormal now could become the new normal depending upon evolutionary selection. The apparent lack of function in behaviour is questionable as in conclusion some function may be determined, or help in coping with stress or a means of communication. The function of stereotypes may withal be revealed in unexpectedly perhaps related to communication (Japyass and Malange, 2014).1.1.6 The Ethological and Animal Welfare view of StereotypyThe animal welfare view is that stereotypies are abnormal, functionless repetitive behaviours (Japyass and Malange, 2014). envision for another ref. The ethological view is that stereotypies are repetitive behaviours that are unchanging irrespective of the context (Japyass and Malange, 2014). These views are drawn together by Mason (1991) defining stereotypy as repetitive, unvarying, uninterr uptable behaviours with no apparent proximate or ultimate function. However, Rapp and Vollmer (2005) write that frequently stereotypic behaviours provides their own reinforcement and not social consequences.1.1.7 What are Impulsive/ arrogant BehavioursImpulsive/compulsive repetitive behaviours are variable and have a goal directed but the behaviour persists even after the achieving the goal or the goal becomes inappropriate (Garner, 2006).1.1.8 Impulsive repetitive behavioursImpulsive repetitive behaviours are identified in humans with Tourettes syndrome manifesting as complex tics, or as trichotillomania, hair plucking.1.1.9 Difference between Impulsive/Compulsive BehavioursClinically the distinction between impulsive and compulsive repetitive behaviours is important, however diverseiating them is more complex in animals than in humans (Garner, 2006).1.1.10 Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder (OCD)Mills and Luescher (2006) state that stereotypy and obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) ar e hard to differentiate Eilam et al. (2012) add that OCD is a disabling particularize affecting the sufferers quality of life. Ethology is the study of animal behaviour aiming to understand proximate and the ultimate causes of behaviours the concept of the ethogram methodology is extended to the study of OCD behaviour (Eilam et al., 2012). Observations by Eilam et al. (2006) showed animals performing rigid behaviour sequences in specific locations, according to Kalueff et al. (2007) these are the spatiotemporal and locomotor characteristics of OCD.1.1.11 What is the difference between OCB and stereotypyChok and Koesler (2014) used functional abstract to assess the differences between stereotypy and obsessive compulsive behaviours (OCB) by identifying physiological states internal (heart rate) and external (defined by facial expression or vocalisations). Signs of pleasure were regarded as a measure positive reinforcement, hence stereotypy and of displeasure regarded as signs of OCB .1.1.12 Obsessive-Compulsive Behaviours (OCB)Humans exhibiting obsessive-compulsive behaviours (OCB) are aware that these behaviours are irrational but are unavailing to resist their compulsion to continue to perform the behaviour.1.2 Stereotypies and the environment1.2.1 Maternal DeprivationCaptive animals particularly in commercial environments but including companion animals are frequently removed from their mothers earlier than would occur in the wild (Latham and Mason, 2008). Maternal deprivation leads to an increase in the frequency and severity stereotypes these can be short term as with belly-nosing in piglets or can cause neural changes inducing later persistent stereotypes (Latham and Mason, 2008).The relationship between the animals stereotypic behaviour and the environmental deficit is not always clear. Wiedenmayer (1997) found that providing a substrate suitable for digging did not reduce stereotypies in gerbils but providing a tunnel system did. Digging was not the c ontrolling motivation just means to achieve a burrow.1.2.2 Stereotypy Interdisciplinary CommunicationThe term stereotypy has different uses in different research areas ethological, medical and animal welfare there is not even an agreement about including lack of function or abnormality in the definition (Japyass and Malange, 2014). Edwards et al. (2012) asserts the lack of a consistent definition for stereotypies is insufficient for both academic and medical diagnostic purposes.1.3 Stereotypies Behaviours1.3.1 Ungulate stereotypiesUngulates are the most common mammal exhibiting stereotypy many ungulate stereotypies tend to resemble species typical feeding and foraging behaviours (Bergeron et al., 2006).Examples of typical stereotypies for ungulates are given in Table 1. Cattle at pasture pass along between 7 to 9 hours grazing and similar time ruminating possibly herbivores have evolved to require a minimum feeding period each day (Redbo and Nordblad,1997). This could explain the n umber of oral stereotypies report for animals fed on a concentrate food with restricted roughage as their time budget alimentation and ruminating is less that at pasture.Table 1 Examples of ungulate stereotypy1.3.2 Carnivore stereotypiesSome species of carnivores do well in captivity do not exhibit abnormal behaviours and lineage successfully. While carnivores that have high activity levels and patrol large ranges have high levels of stereotypy. Vickery and Mason (2005) found carnivore stereotypies are mostly locomotory pacing and weaving, other reported stereotypies was some oral and head swaying. Clubb and Mason (2007) found the carnivore stereotypy levels are significantly predicted by their typical travel distances and natural home-range size. Perhaps some species are unsuitable for zoos and should be conserved in large areas that enable their natural behaviours.1.4 Overall query Aims1.4.1 Relationship between breed type and stereotypyTo try to measure the air of different s tereotypies across breed groups. It has been found that some breeds have their own particular set of stereotypes for example flack sucking in Doberman Pinchers (Houpt, 1992).1.5 Outline Research Methods and Timescales1.5.1 Research methodA questionnaire pass on be used to measure the relationship between breed type and the stereotypy emitted. The value was initially created using some(prenominal) survey software programs available online many were restricted either the number of questions asked or the variety of question types was limited, or the resultant output file was not in a coiffe readily converted for SPSS. Eventually Google Docs was selected and the survey created and was piloted on social media the resulting file of about 20 responses was downloaded in text format that could be readily input into a spreadsheet which then needs to be reformatted for input into SPSS for processing. The questionnaire included some questions that had open questions in the form of the other excerption a free text input area. This was to allow flexibility and for respondents to feel empowered and encourage more accurate replies. This means these responses need interpreting and the formation of new categories or allocated to available options for processing (Questionnaire, 2015). These questions are qualitative but once the responses have been interpreted in allocated to categories, the subsequent treatment of the data will be quantitative and analysed using quantitative statistical methods.The social environment shared by the domestic dog and their human companions unique and investigating the environment care must be taken not introduce bias by the questions asked.1.5.2 Comparability of Responses1.5.2.1 Outline Research Method 1 TimescalesDuring May 2015 the survey was deployed in several different social media and forums across a number of interest groups including relating to dogs trainers, problems, breed categories and general chat forums. The number of responde nts stalled by June and further locations sort.